Code written by a model and code written by a team that maintains it differ in predictable ways. None of them are about typos — they're about context. Here's what changes and how to close the gap.
ChatGPT comments almost every block, often restating the line below it. Teams comment less, and when they do, it's to explain a decision, a constraint or a workaround — things the code can't say on its own.
A model picks names that are reasonable in isolation. A maintainer picks names that match the rest of the codebase: the same conventions, the same domain vocabulary, the same abbreviations everyone already uses.
"Step 1", "Step 2" comments reflect how the model reasoned through the problem. Maintained code is organised into functions and names instead.
Temporary variables that are returned straight away, defensive checks for cases that can't happen, and docstrings that repeat the function name all add length without adding meaning.
The fix isn't to make AI code worse. It's to make it consistent with the codebase it's joining: remove comment noise, apply your conventions and simplify. You can do this by hand, or use Code Humanizer's style presets to do it in seconds.
Paste any ChatGPT or Copilot code and get a version that matches your style. 3 free tries, no account needed.
Try Code Humanizer freeCode Humanizer is a readability and style tool. It isn't designed to hide who wrote code, and using it to break a course's academic integrity rules is against our Terms of Service. If your course allows AI assistance, comparing an AI draft with a cleaned-up version is a good way to learn idiomatic style.